Re: Tux3 Report: Faster than tmpfs, what?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



also interesting information... Study of 2,047 papers on PubMed finds
that two-thirds of retracted papers were down to scientific
misconduct, not error

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Daniel Phillips
<daniel.raymond.phillips@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> Thanks for the catch - I should indeed have noted that "modified
> dbench" was used for this benchmark, thus amplifying Tux3's advantage
> in delete performance. This literary oversight does not make the
> results any less interesting: we beat Tmpfs on that particular load.
> Beating tmpfs at anything is worthy of note. Obviously, all three
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux