2013-03-18 (월), 18:29 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> 2013/3/18, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > The build_free_nid should not add free nids over nm_i->max_nid.
> > But, there was a hole that invalid free nid was added by the following
> > scenario.
> >
> > Let's suppose nm_i->max_nid = 150 and the last NAT page has 100 ~ 200 nids.
> >
> > build_free_nids
> > - get_current_nat_page loads the last NAT page
> > - scan_nat_page can add 100 ~ 200 nids
> > -> Bug here!
> > So, when scanning an NAT page, we should check each candidate whether it is
> > over max_nid or not.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index c60919f..3fb6dfe 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1270,6 +1270,8 @@ static int scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
> > i = start_nid % NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
> >
> > for (; i < NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++, start_nid++) {
> > + if (start_nid >= nm_i->max_nid)
> > + return fcnt;
> Hi Jaegeuk.
> How about use "break;" instread of "return fcnt" ?
> I think that break is better because there is no extra condition before return.
Ok, thanks. :)
>
> Thanks.
> > blk_addr = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
> > BUG_ON(blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
> > if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
> > --
> > 1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
