[PATCH] f2fs: fix not to allocate max_nid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The build_free_nid should not add free nids over nm_i->max_nid.
But, there was a hole that invalid free nid was added by the following scenario.

Let's suppose nm_i->max_nid = 150 and the last NAT page has 100 ~ 200 nids.

build_free_nids
  - get_current_nat_page loads the last NAT page
  - scan_nat_page can add 100 ~ 200 nids
    -> Bug here!
So, when scanning an NAT page, we should check each candidate whether it is
over max_nid or not.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/f2fs/node.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index c60919f..3fb6dfe 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1270,6 +1270,8 @@ static int scan_nat_page(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
 	i = start_nid % NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK;
 
 	for (; i < NAT_ENTRY_PER_BLOCK; i++, start_nid++) {
+		if (start_nid >= nm_i->max_nid)
+			return fcnt;
 		blk_addr  = le32_to_cpu(nat_blk->entries[i].block_addr);
 		BUG_ON(blk_addr == NEW_ADDR);
 		if (blk_addr == NULL_ADDR)
-- 
1.8.1.3.566.gaa39828

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux