On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 10:26:37 +0400 Vyacheslav Dubeyko <slava@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > So, as you can see the discussion revives again. :-) And I need to > > > familiarize with implementation of xattrs in JFS before to answer again. > > > I had objection that we need to remember about using HFS+ volumes as > > > under Linux as under Mac OS X. Maybe, JFS implementation of xattrs to > > > change my vision. > > > > I'm still unclear where we stand with these patches. Which if any of > > these should I merge? > > > > As I can see these patches contain implementation of xattr support (v3) > and reworked error processing in some parts of hfsplus driver. The > version 3 of xattr support was implemented after remarks of Christoph > Hellwig about necessity to have "osx." prefix. So, after this e-mail we > had achieved understanding about proper implementation and it was done. > > Maybe I misunderstand something but I thought that these patches were > merged in linux-next yet. Or do you talking about merging in mainline? > > Currently, I am working on ACLs support in hfsplus driver. But, from my > point of view, these patches are important and without ACLs support. Yes, they've all been in linux-next for a while. To be more specific: is Christoph OK with a mainline merge? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
