On Wed, 2012-11-28 at 08:22 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 05:18:19PM +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko wrote: > > I don't insist on the patch. But if the function has such description: > > > > * RETURNS: > > * Pointer to new bio on success, NULL on failure. > > > > I prefer to check on NULL anyway. :-) > > > Check the sentence a couple lines above in the same comment: > > * When @bs is not NULL, if %__GFP_WAIT is set then bio_alloc will always be > * able to allocate a bio. This is due to the mempool guarantees. > Ok. Agree. Thank you. :-) With the best regards, Vyacheslav Dubeyko. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
