Re: [patch 3/7] fs, notify: Add file handle entry into inotify_inode_mark

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:20:57 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > >  struct inotify_inode_mark {
> > >  	struct fsnotify_mark fsn_mark;
> > >  	int wd;
> > > +#ifdef INOTIFY_USE_FHANDLE
> > > +	__u8 fhandle[sizeof(struct file_handle) + MAX_HANDLE_SZ];
> > > +#endif
> > >  };
> > 
> > Whoa.  This adds 128+8 bytes to the inotify_inode_mark.  That's a lot of
> > bloat, and there can be a lot of inotify_inode_mark's in the system?
> 
> Yes, that's why it's not turned on by default, only if is c/r turned on.
> iirc I've been said that usually only about 40 bytes is used (in the tests
> I met only 8 bytes). Letme re-check all things.

The question is, how many `struct inotify_inode_mark's are instantiated
system-wide?  Could be millions?

Dumb question: do we really need inotify_inode_mark.fhandle at all? 
What prevents us from assembling this info on demand when ->show_fdinfo() is
called?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux