2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> >>>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>>>> file/directory removal and creation. >>>> >>>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". >>>> Please >>>> explain why we need this change. >>>> >>>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >>>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. >>> Hi. OGAWA. >>> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and >>> XFS. >>> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? >>> Am I missing ? >> >> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with specifical test reseult with other filesystem. > > BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. "historical" means It is difficult to change ? Thanks. > -- > OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
