OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>> >>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>>> file/directory removal and creation. >>> >>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please >>> explain why we need this change. >>> >>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. >> Hi. OGAWA. >> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and XFS. >> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? >> Am I missing ? > > What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
