On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:59:35AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> So, it returns 0 on success and 1 on failure, which in itself isn't a > >> particularly good idea. > > > > you mean it should return -ENODATA instead? > > Yeap, this is a bug, right? We end up passing that 1 to the set_xattr caller. yes, will resubmit Thanks! -- Aristeu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
