Hello, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Aristeu Rozanski <aris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> So, it returns 0 on success and 1 on failure, which in itself isn't a >> particularly good idea. > > you mean it should return -ENODATA instead? Yeap, this is a bug, right? We end up passing that 1 to the set_xattr caller. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
