Re: [PATCH] fs: Introducing Lanyard Filesystem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 2012-08-19 15:34, Dan Luedtke wrote:

>I analyzed about 600k file stored on various removable storage devices. 
>80 volunteers sent in data about their devices, generated by a program 
>(windows) and scripts (linux, bsd, osx) I wrote for that purpose. The 
>data shows that people use more complex filesystems as soon as they are 
>confronted with problems (mostly the 4GB limit). After that they have 
>problems getting their data accessed by other systems. I derived from 
>that, that we need a filesystem that is so simple that even unpopular 
>operating systems can implement it without having their business plan 
>explode.

Those unpopular OSes do not care about *any other* filesystem at all. 

The only way to get a filesystem accepted is by making an ISO standard
out of it - or something in that direction - *and* use it thoroughly
in products, like UDF. Even then, support for new revisions of UDF
has been rather slow-coming.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux