On Sun, 2012-08-19 at 15:25 +0200, Marco Stornelli wrote: > Ok, I try to do a summary. You are trying to write a new general and > minimal fs for mobile storage device, minimal enough to be easy ported > on several fs. So at the end you are trying to replace the solution is > used today on many platforms (fat32). Without other consideration about > "no-feature is a feature", it seems to me really challenging because the > project can fail its goal no because there is design problem, bugs and > so on but because of limited use. We are talking about interoperability > problem, and we really know some companies out there from this point of > view :) You nailed it and you made me feel like Don Quijote. I'd like to give it a try anyway. regards, Dan -- Dan Luedtke http://www.danrl.de -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
