Re: [Squashfs-devel] [squashfs] Who is responsible for code review?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "Phillip" == Phillip Lougher <phillip.lougher@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

Hi,

 Phillip>  The patches in question are adding a new feature to Squashfs.
 Phillip> New features are always nice to have, but always carry the
 Phillip> risk of introducing bugs, performance regressions, and
 Phillip> generally making the code harder to maintain if (as is the
 Phillip> case with these patches) they have been implemented in a way
 Phillip> not to my liking.

 Phillip> I reviewed these patches when they arrived, and I got a poor
 Phillip> opinion of them.  However, I decided to give the patches a
 Phillip> chance, and wait and see what feedback/code-review they got.
 Phillip> So far they have received nothing.

I would also prefer to see direct mtd support instead of through
mtdblock if anything rather than this direct memory access.

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux