Re: atime and filesystems with snapshots (especially Btrfs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2012-05-25, at 9:59, Alexander Block <ablock84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Are you talking about the atime for the primary copy, or the atime for the snapshots?  IMHO, the atime should not be updated for a snapshot unless it is explicitly mounted r/w, or it isn't really a good snapshot.
>
Snapshots are by default r/w but can be created r/o explicitly. But
that doesn't matter for the normal use case where you snapshot / and
continue working on /. After snapshotting, all metadata is shared
between the two subvolumes, but when a metadata block in one of both
subvolume changes (no matter which one), this one metadata block get's
cowed and unshared and uses up more space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux