On 15.05.2012 00:19, Jan Kara wrote: > On Sun 13-05-12 15:48:55, Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko wrote: >> minixfs file size check is buggy and it doesn't allow creating a block which >> can't be fully filled > Umm, I'm not really minix expert but who'd set s_max_size to something > which is not a multiple of block size? This looks rather artifical problem > to me... > The usual and natural limit comes from interpreting 32-bit size field as signed or unsigned. So it's either 2G - 1 or 4G - 1. Neither of which is a multiple of block size. -- Regards Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature