Hi, I was having a leave, but now came back to this stuff. On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 22:12 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > If fsinfo is inode, the order can be > > 1) flush inodes > 1a) flush fsinfo inode > 1b) flush normal inodes > 2) last iput(normal inodes) > truncate() > dirty fsinfo inode 3) a bit later fsinfo inode is flushed again. Sorry, I do not still see where is the issue. Also, how is it different form the current situation where you have absolutely the same. I really still do not see the issue. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
