Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] fat: switch to fsinfo_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 20:51 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Yes, I still worry about order. About ->sync_fs(), you are looking the
> following?

Hirofumi, you still did not explain why the order matters. If it
matters, it should be easy to explain.

But I will look at this and think about the ordering, thanks for
feed-back. But if you could explain why writing out FSINFO before inodes
is an issue, it'd be very helpful.

Thanks!

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux