On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:56:26PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > When writeback_single_inode() is called on inode which has I_SYNC already > set while doing WB_SYNC_NONE, inode is moved to b_more_io list. However > this makes sense only if the caller is flusher thread. For other callers of > writeback_single_inode() it doesn't really make sense and may be even wrong > - flusher thread may be doing WB_SYNC_ALL writeback in parallel. > > So we move requeueing from writeback_single_inode() to writeback_sb_inodes(). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
