Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I've no particular attachment to the name 'xstat'. If you'd prefer > > 'statx' I could go for that. > > I prefer something other than xstat and statx(at) seems acceptable enough. > What I'd really prefer is a name that is less meaninglessly arcane, > but I haven't thought of any good ones. fileinfoat() perhaps? I think stat*at() is better, though, as people are used to the stat function family. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
