Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have no comment on the functionality. But "xstat" is probably a poor > choice of name. There is precedent for that function name with different > meaning in the userland APIs. (It's a moderately useless meaning inherited > from SVR4, but regardless overloading a name previously used is unwise.) I've no particular attachment to the name 'xstat'. If you'd prefer 'statx' I could go for that. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
