Re: getdents - ext4 vs btrfs performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2012/3/1 Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jacek Luczak <difrost.kernel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> While I was about to grab acp I've noticed seekwatcher with made my day :)
>>
>> seekwatcher run of tar cf to eliminate writes (all done on 3.2.7):
>> 1) btrfs: http://dozzie.jarowit.net/~dozzie/luczajac/tar_btrfs.png
>> 2) ext4: http://dozzie.jarowit.net/~dozzie/luczajac/tar_ext4.png
>> 3) both merged: http://dozzie.jarowit.net/~dozzie/luczajac/tar_btrfs_ext4.png
>>
>> I will send acp results soon.
>>
> Would you please take reiserfs into account?

As of now not (lack of time) but I'm pretty close to consider XFS in
the game. Whenever I will have more time and there won't be a pressure
on giving host back to production I will redo same tests for reiserfs.

Now I'm focused on the userspace sorting results.

-Jacek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux