On Sat, January 21, 2012 00:55, Roland McGrath wrote: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Indan Zupancic <indan@xxxxxx> wrote: >> It's a lot easier for existing code to add an extra cs check than to use > > The issue is whether showing fictitious high bits of %cs as set will break > existing applications (debuggers, etc.) that look at it and think that it's > nothing but the hardware state zero-extended, as it is today. Argh, sorry, I meant eflags. I even checked how many bits are free in eflags and still wrote 'cs'. Greetings, Indan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
