Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/18/2012 01:04 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/18/2012 01:01 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> If we're going to use bits in an existing register field I would be
>>> happier if we used bits [31:16] of CS, which are unlikely to ever be
>>> used for anything.
>>
>> See my note about that: I would have preferred CS or ORIG_AX myself,
>> but that breaks existing binaries. So that isn't really an option.
>>
> 
> Fair enough.  Sigh.  I still think an actual pseudo-register would be
> better.
> 

Roland, could you refresh my memory what your objection to this was?

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux