Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/18/2012 05:45 PM, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> 
> For security reasons it should be impossible for userspace to set those bits
> themselves, otherwise the tracer can be easily fooled on an old kernel. That
> seems to be the case for the higher bits of eflags, so eflags would work. And
> the current code checks cs, also checking eflags would be very easy to add.
> 

I think this goes without saying, and isn't an issue for the options
currently on the table (including regset).

	-phpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux