Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> It can securely enable syscall auditing which can catch all syscalls
> (however you only get race free memory arguments for the ones with LSM hooks
> at the right place). Really need both.
>
> I agree it's not easy to get tight (and also not pretty), but you have a lot
> better chance doing it this way than with ptrace.

.. And how the f*^& did you imagine that something like chrome would do that?

You need massive amounts of privileges, and it's a total disaster in
every single respect.

Stop pushing crap. No, ptrace isn't wonderful, but your LSM+auditing
idea is a billion times worse in all respects.

We can definitely fix the ptrace issue with compat system calls.

THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL YOU CAN EVER FIX LSM+AUDIT TO BE USABLE!

Stop bothering to even bring it up. It's dead, Jim.

               Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux