Re: Compat 32-bit syscall entry from 64-bit task!?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Umm. But the exact same is true of "LSM for custom jail". It's a
> f*&^ing disaster, and it's a whole lot more complicated than ptrace.
> 
> Plus it can't even do what ptrace does, so what's the point?  There's

It can securely enable syscall auditing which can catch all syscalls
(however you only get race free memory arguments for the ones with LSM hooks 
at the right place). Really need both.

I agree it's not easy to get tight (and also not pretty), but you have a lot 
better chance doing it this way than with ptrace.

-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux