Re: XFS/btrfs performance after IO-less dirty throttling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 12:25:08PM +0800, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 09:53:11AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > I'm indeed happy that you don't care that much on that regression
> > introduced by me ;-)
> 
> Heh.
> 
> BTW, do these tests run to ENOSPC?

Nope. Shall ENOSPC (performance) be tested?

> >                 10829.00        +4.3%     11296.00  TOTAL xfs:xfs_delalloc_enospc
> 
> This implies that it does.

Not really. The USB key partition size is 7.1GB.
Even in the fastest 1dd case, only 4GB data is written:

wfg@bee /export/writeback% cat fat/UKEY-thresh=100M/xfs-1dd-1-3.2.0-rc3/ls-files 
131 -rw-rw-r-- 1 root root 4060078080 Dec  8 15:57 /fs/sdb3/zero-1

That's about 6.7MB/s write bandwidth running for 600 seconds.

Thanks,
Fengguang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux