On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 04:39:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I suspect some users really might want a path for debugging, though. > > > ? ? ? ?d_absolute_path(path, ancestor, buf, buflen) - grabs the > > reference to the most remote ancestor it can find, puts pathname > > into buf, never returns NULL. > > But why do you want that ancestor thing? Because the path is useless without some idea where it starts? "It was /foo/bar/baz counting from some point; might have been global root, might have been any random mountpoint if we'd raced with umount and you've got no way to tell one from another" is not particulary useful in logs. The thing is, on the next boot exact same line might grow or lose a prefix. Randomness of that kind is OK if you know that the pathname is just the best-effort thing here and you *always* end up guessing which one it was. But here most of the real-world cases will have them relative to absolute root and stable. That's a really ugly combination - something that works most of the time until you hit a race. Then, without any notice, you need to guess that _this_ time have to go looking for what that pathname might have been appended to... Not fun. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
