Re: [PATCH 1/2] writeback: Improve busyloop prevention

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu 20-10-11 21:39:38, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:33:00PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:09:09PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > Jan,
> > > 
> > > I tried the below combined patch over the ioless one, and find some
> > > minor regressions. I studied the thresh=1G/ext3-1dd case in particular
> > > and find that nr_writeback and the iostat avgrq-sz drops from time to time.
> > > 
> > > I'll try to bisect the changeset.
> 
> This is interesting, the culprit is found to be patch 1, which is
> simply
>                 if (work->for_kupdate) {
>                         oldest_jif = jiffies -
>                                 msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10);
> -                       work->older_than_this = &oldest_jif;
> -               }
> +               } else if (work->for_background)
> +                       oldest_jif = jiffies;
  Yeah. I had a look into the trace and you can notice that during the
whole dd run, we were running a single background writeback work (you can
verify that by work->nr_pages decreasing steadily). Without refreshing
oldest_jif, we'd write block device inode for /dev/sda (you can identify
that by bdi=8:0, ino=0) only once. When refreshing oldest_jif, we write it
every 5 seconds (kjournald dirties the device inode after committing a
transaction by dirtying metadata buffers which were just committed and can
now be checkpointed either by kjournald or flusher thread). So although the
performance is slightly reduced, I'd say that the behavior is a desired
one.

Also if you observed the performance on a really long run, the difference
should get smaller because eventually, kjournald has to flush the metadata
blocks when the journal fills up and we need to free some journal space and
at that point flushing is even more expensive because we have to do a
blocking write during which all transaction operations, thus effectively
the whole filesystem, are blocked.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux