On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 09:18:21PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one > > disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original > > patchset is consistently performing much better :) > > It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to > assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks! Thank you! Glad that we finally reaches some consensus :) Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
