Hi Curt, > > Another question is, how can the display format be script friendly? > > The current form looks not easily parse-able at least for "cut".. > > I suppose you mean because of the variable number of tokens. Yeah, > this can be hard. Of course, I always just use "awk '{print $NF}'" > and it works for me :-) . But I'd be happy to change these to use a > consistent # of args. Yes, thank you. One possible format come to my mind later is to present the numbers in a 2d table, like this: pages chunks works chunk_kb work_kbps balance_dirty_pages XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXXX background XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXXX sync XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXX XXXXX ... The format is not only human friendly and trivial for scripting, but also permits to add new lines or columns (append only though) without breaking compatibility. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html