Le vendredi 05 août 2011 à 04:35 +0400, Glauber Costa a écrit :
> This patch lays the foundation for us to limit the dcache size.
> Each super block can have only a maximum amount of dentries under its
> sub-tree. Allocation fails if we we're over limit and the cache
> can't be pruned to free up space for the newcomers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/dcache.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/super.c | 1 +
> include/linux/fs.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
> index ac19d24..52a0faf 100644
> --- a/fs/dcache.c
> +++ b/fs/dcache.c
> @@ -1180,6 +1180,28 @@ void shrink_dcache_parent(struct dentry * parent)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(shrink_dcache_parent);
>
> +static int dcache_mem_check(struct super_block *sb)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int nr_dentry;
> + struct shrink_control sc = {
> + .gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> + };
> +
> + do {
> + nr_dentry = 0;
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + nr_dentry += per_cpu(*sb->s_nr_dentry, i);
You seriously want to call this for every __d_alloc() invocation,
even if s_nr_dentry_max is the default value (INT_MAX) ?
On a 4096 cpu machine, it will be _very_ slow.
A percpu_counter would be the thing to consider, since you can avoid the
for_each_possible_cpu(i) loop if percpu_counter_read() is smaller than
sb->s_nr_dentry_max.
Check how its done in include/net/tcp.h, tcp_too_many_orphans()
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
