Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 20:59 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 08:54:17PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 00:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > >                s - x 3
> > >  f(x) :=  1 + (-----)
> > >                  d
> > > 
> > btw, if you want steeper slopes for rampup and brake you can add another
> > factor like:
> > 
> >                  s - x 3
> >   f(x) :=  1 + a(-----)
> >                    d
> >  
> > And solve the whole f(l)=0 thing again to determine d in l and a.
> > 
> > For 0 < a < 1 the slopes increase.
> 
> Yes, we can leave it as a future tuning option. For now I'm pretty
> satisfied with the current function's shape :)

Oh for sure, it just occurred to me when looking at your plots and
thought I'd at least mention it.. You know something to poke at on a
rainy afternoon ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux