Re: [PATCH 0/2] splice: i_mutex vs splice write deadlock V2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 04:45:25PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> generic_file_splice_write() takes the inode->i_mutex after the
> filesystem has taken whatever locks it needs to ensure sanity.
> however, this typically violates the locking order of filesystems
> with their own locks in that the order is usually i_mutex ->
> filesystem lock.
> 
> XFS is such a case, and generic_file_splice_write() is generating
> lockdep warnings because of lock inversions between the
> inode->i_mutex and the XFS_I(inode)->i_iolock. There is also a
> reported case of fio causing a deadlock when it mixes IO types
> (e.g. splice vs direct IO).

Another case is ocfs2, which looks like a perfect candidate to be
converted over to your infrastructure.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux