On Mon, 2011-08-08 at 17:03 +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > + /* s_dentry_lru_lock protects s_dentry_lru, s_nr_dentry_unused */ > + spinlock_t s_dentry_lru_lock ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp; > struct list_head s_dentry_lru; /* unused dentry lru */ Wouldn't it make sense to have both those on the same cacheline? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
