On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 04:59:51PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > > > > Thanks for comments, Dave! Still the read only lock without > > increasing sequence number might be useful, no? (patch 1) > > I'll defer to Al on that one - the intricacies of the rename locking > are way over my head. ok > > FWIW, the problems with the per-sb dcache LRU lock seem to be gone - > it's not causing my test machines to fall over with the current > Linus tree like it was during 2.6.39-rc and 3.0-rc kernels... > > Cheers, > > Dave. ok, thanks for info! Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
