On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 01:25:03PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: ... > > The VFS shrinker code is now already called on a per-sb basis. Each > sb has it's own shrinker context that deals with dentries, inodes > and anything a filesystem wants to have shrunk in the call. That > solves the original issue I had with your "limit the dentry cache > size" patch series in that it didn't shrink or limit the other VFS > caches that were the ones that were really consuming all your > memory... Thanks for comments, Dave! Still the read only lock without increasing sequence number might be useful, no? (patch 1) ... > > Dave. Cyrill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
