(2011/07/14 9:11), James Morris wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> It sounds like people are effectively Ack'ing the patch, but with this >> kind of patch I don't want to add the "implicit Ack" that I often do >> for regular stuff. >> >> So could people who think that the patch is ok in its current form >> just send me their acked-by or reviewed-by? I haven't heard any actual >> objection to it, and I think it's valid for the current -rc. >> >> Alternatively, feel free to send a comment like "I think it's the >> right thing, but maybe it should wait for the next merge window".. > > Count me in the latter. > > It does look ok to me, but I'd be happier if it had more testing first (in > -mm perhaps). I think some security folk may be on summer vacation, too. I don't think I am best person to take ack. but I also don't want to hesitate to help Solar's good improvemnt. Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> And I'll second James. next mere window is probably safer. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
