Re: Unionmount status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2011-04-15, at 6:29 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> Apparently tmpfs does not support generic xattr.  I understand why
> tmpfs is an attractive choice for an upper filesystem, so this should
> be addressed.
> 
> I see two options here:
> 
> 1) implement generic xattr in tmpfs

There was a patch posted recently to add xattr support to tmpfs, so that it can use security labels:

From: Eric Paris <eparis@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] tmpfs: implement xattr support for the entire security namespace
Date: March 29, 2011 12:56:49 PM MDT

Cheers, Andreas





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux