Re: Unionmount status?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 15 April 2011 13:31, Miklos Szeredi <miklos@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Michal Suchanek <hramrach@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Cleaning up temporary files...
>>> [ Â Ânn.nnnnnn] overlayfs: ERROR - failed to whiteout 'motd'
>>> find: cannot delete `./motd': Operation not supported
>>
>> What is the upper filesystem type? ÂIs xattr support enabled?
>>
>
> The upper filesystem is tmpfs and there is not option regarding XATTR
> in the config.

Apparently tmpfs does not support generic xattr.  I understand why
tmpfs is an attractive choice for an upper filesystem, so this should
be addressed.

I see two options here:

1) implement generic xattr in tmpfs
2) take whiteout/opaque support from union mounts and use that

Both have advantages and disadvantages.

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux