Re: shrinking set of cifs fixes to merge for 2.6.39 to small set

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:30:14 -0500
Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:33:42 -0500
> > Steve French <smfrench@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> Since it is already past the merge window (was waiting to discuss some
> >> fixes with others at the fs summit last week before merge), ÂI shrunk
> >> the list of cifs patches waiting for merge (in cifs-2.6.git) to a much
> >> smaller set of more critical ones. See below. (I moved the others
> >> temporarily to a for-2.6.40 branch in cifs-2.6.git). ÂWe (Jeff,
> >> Shirish, I etc.) need to build/test more with this set before sending
> >> though.
> >>
> >> Jeff Layton (8):
> >> Â Â Â cifs: check for private_data before trying to put it
> >> Â Â Â cifs: replace /proc/fs/cifs/Experimental with a module parm
> >
> > Â Â Â ÂI think we should also put in the patch that adds the
> > Â Â Â Âpage_mkwrite handler.
> 
> I agree but it had more merge conflicts.
> 

Ok, I just resent the patch with the merge conflicts fixed.

I've also given the set you're proposing + the page_mkwrite patch a
quick smoke test run with connectathon and it seems to be ok.

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux