On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:10 PM, J. R. Okajima <hooanon05@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Isn't it path.dentry->d_inode instead of nd.inode?
>
> J. R. Okajima
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index 5bb7588..1df3bee 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -2356,8 +2374,9 @@ reval:
> goto exit_dput;
> error = __do_follow_link(&path, &nd, &cookie);
> if (unlikely(error)) {
> - if (!IS_ERR(cookie) && nd.inode->i_op->put_link)
> - nd.inode->i_op->put_link(path.dentry, &nd, cookie);
> + struct dentry *i = path.dentry->d_inode;
> + if (!IS_ERR(cookie) && i->i_op->put_link)
> + i->i_op->put_link(path.dentry, &nd, cookie);
> /* nd.path had been dropped */
> nd.path = path;
> goto out_path;
It should be the inode we followed, rather than the inode of the
new path, I think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
