Re: [patch 8/8] fs: add i_op->sync_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:25:10AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:48:36PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > OK, I don't exactly see why a sync_inode with appropriate flag could
> > not solve that problem. I'll take a bit more look through nfs and
> > xfs. Thanks...
> 
> We could also overload all inode operations into a single ioctl like
> method, but that doesn't make it a good design.

I've been a bit busy lately and haven't had time to continue this
discussion. Thanks for your input so far, and I'll get back to it soon.

I will try to get out a set of changes for current merge window that
fix the bulk of the problems without going into areas you disagree
with, and then we can have a smaller set of changes we to agree on for
next merge window. I will come back and reply to your points when I
get a bit more time.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux