Re: [patch 8/8] fs: add i_op->sync_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:31:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> And actually I think it is much better to have sync_inode, which means
> we'll be able to get rid of commit_metadata (which should be an inode
> operation anyway, not an export operation which really should deal with
> exporting filesystems to a non-vfs namespace, not nfsd hacks).
> 
> commit_metadata would just be sync_inode with a null range or no data
> sync flag set.

As explained in the previous mail it's not just not writing data, it's
conceptually quite different from fsync.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux