On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 16:26 -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 09:19 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: > > > Before making any changes to the kernel xattr.h, I want to understand > > the reason for two xattr.h files, one in /usr/include/linux/ and the > > other in /usr/include/xattr/. /usr/include/linux/xattr.h contains those > > elements not defined as __kernel__, while /usr/include/xattr/xattr.h > > contains that and other definitions. Will changing the kernel xattr.h > > version change both? > > I don't know what /usr/include/xattr/ is but /usr/include/linux/ is > where the kernel-headers are supposed to end up. I'm guessing > /usr/include/xattr/ is the glibc function definitions? (my glibc > function definitions for xattrs are in /usr/include/sys/xattr.h) > > I sent a patch to export them all. I didn't cc stable since it > clearly change more than it needs to, but we really should send > something to stable.... > > -Eric Thanks Eric. Don't know what happened, but /usr/include/xattr/xattr.h is gone. /usr/include/sys/xattr.h contains the names of the user space xattr tools, not the kernel version. I'll create the patch for stable. thanks, Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
