On Tuesday, October 12, 2010 09:06:09 am Mimi Zohar wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 14:14 +0300, Ozan ÃaÄlayan wrote: > > Cuma 02 Temmuz 2010 gÃnà (saat 03:16:01) James Morris ÅunlarÄ yazmÄÅtÄ: > > > On Thu, 1 Jul 2010, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > > Make the security extended attributes names global. Updated to move > > > > the remaining Smack xattrs. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > This drops > > > > #define XATTR_CAPS_SUFFIX "capability" > > #define XATTR_NAME_CAPS XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX XATTR_CAPS_SUFFIX > > > > definitions from capability.h and puts them in xattr.h's #ifdef > > __KERNEL__ section making them invisible to userspace like libcap-ng > > causing build failures. > > > > Am I wrong? > > You're correct. It's the same reason that cap-ng.c has to define > 'security'. > > #ifdef VFS_CAP_U32 > #include <attr/xattr.h> > #define XATTR_SECURITY_PREFIX "security." > > Am cc'ing Steve. So does this mean I need to provide more definitions for libcap-ng to work with future kernels or are you asking my opinion? My opinion is that if user space needs it to work correctly, please let it be available so I don't have to make my own define which may be inaccurate one day. Thanks, -Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
