On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:55:24AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > + hlist_bl_for_each_entry(inode, node, &b->head, i_hash) {
> > + if (inode->i_ino == ino && inode->i_sb == sb) {
>
> wouldn't it be more natural to test the sb first here?
Maybe, but I think an inode number match is less likely, so the
order it currently does the check results in less code being
executed on misses. I'll have a look at the rest of the code and do
whatever order they do.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
