On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 03:33:06AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> > > > > Protect the inod hash with a single lock is not scalable. Convert > > s/inod/inode/ > > > p = &root->inode_tree.rb_node; > > parent = NULL; > > > > - if (hlist_unhashed(&inode->i_hash)) > > + if (hlist_bl_unhashed(&inode->i_hash)) > > Maybe introduce an inode_unhashed helper for this check which we're > doing in quite a lot of places? Ok, makes sense. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
