On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 04:21:25PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx> > > Protect the inod hash with a single lock is not scalable. Convert s/inod/inode/ > p = &root->inode_tree.rb_node; > parent = NULL; > > - if (hlist_unhashed(&inode->i_hash)) > + if (hlist_bl_unhashed(&inode->i_hash)) Maybe introduce an inode_unhashed helper for this check which we're doing in quite a lot of places? Otherwise looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
