On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 05:02:21AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 08:47:52PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > (though if you happened to respin, I'd be be glad for those newlines > > between GFP_KERNEL, BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT to go away now) > > > > This patch could go in any time now: I may want to push it in and > > get it to 35-stable, because it certainly helps against the swap > > discard regression that Nigel reported (though I've not yet seen > > his numbers with this). However, I don't think it eliminates the > > regression, so I've more testing and experimenting to do before > > deciding about it - the right answer may just be to disable swap > > discard, as you asked for long ago. > > If we do get a bit testing I'd be almost inclined to drop BLKDEV_IFL_BARRIER > under the floor for all callers in .36, and also remove BLKDEV_IFL_WAIT, > as it's now unconditional. That would allow us to simpliy the > synchronous interfaces for the two, and give us an easy way to develop > a proper asynchronous discard interface in the .37 cycle without > interfering with the barrier rework. Any comments on that idea from the > filesystem crowd? > No complaints here. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
